I finally clicked on that infernal "P*ink Patch" link (3/4 down the web-page)
that pervades the ad. banners of F*Book Inc. (Perhaps this a sign that all-invasive, repeat, repeat, advertising does work?)
and one of the so-called models
looked frightfully skinny (see the above pic.)
Surely the patches are intended
for people
who need to lose weight
in order to gain health benefits,
not just people who desire
to shed weight for its own sake
and so damage their health in the process.
I really feel this image is improper, not on moral grounds;
I'm sure there are some people who really dig 'rexia-porn, but on the simple fact that the picture misleads as to the correct usage of the product. Surely this breaks the definite descriptions act of 1985? Regardless, she looks gratuitously trimmed in the 'mid by some kind of digital-butcher.
that pervades the ad. banners of F*Book Inc. (Perhaps this a sign that all-invasive, repeat, repeat, advertising does work?)
and one of the so-called models
looked frightfully skinny (see the above pic.)
Surely the patches are intended
for people
who need to lose weight
in order to gain health benefits,
not just people who desire
to shed weight for its own sake
and so damage their health in the process.
I really feel this image is improper, not on moral grounds;
I'm sure there are some people who really dig 'rexia-porn, but on the simple fact that the picture misleads as to the correct usage of the product. Surely this breaks the definite descriptions act of 1985? Regardless, she looks gratuitously trimmed in the 'mid by some kind of digital-butcher.
No comments:
Post a Comment